🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to resume atomic discussions with the United States on condition that it is treated with "respect" and "honor", Iran's top diplomat has announced.

Abbas Araghchi said solely negotiations produced results, and shared fresh requests had come from go-betweens to restart discussions with the American leadership. He asserted Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Iran had not yet reached a point to permit the global atomic watchdog to inspect bombed nuclear sites for safety concerns.

Walking a Complex Route

Araghchi is navigating a complex course since Iran wishes not to be perceived to be proceeding from a situation of vulnerability, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen more resilient defensively and mentally from the coordinated strike on its atomic facilities in June.

He was addressing at a defense forum in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to refine atomic fuel domestically that it will never give up" – the main reason of the impasse in the previous talks.

Previous Negotiations Unexpectedly Terminated

The earlier sessions of talks between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and acrimonious conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, targeted Iranian nuclear sites in a 12-day war that concluded with the American leader claiming the locations had been destroyed. Following this, Western states used their authority to restore international penalties, but Iran maintains they have not had a significant effect.

Perfect Agreement Offered

Tehran representatives claimed they felt they had achieved a "magic solution" to the enrichment issue in previous talks, when it was settled an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could enrich uranium. Each party would have been able to claim victory since domestic enrichment would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's enrichment initiative was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been settled in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could operate on Iranian soil, but that was a natural consequence of the cooperative offer. Officials stated on multiple occasions they had achieved a deal with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to collapse due to "detractors in America".

Present Situation

Iran's diplomats stated the cooperative arrangement was now no longer available, but it seems very probable the proposal could be resurrected in various formats if negotiations resume.

Trump last week claimed he had been receiving messages that Iran wanted to resume discussions, but confidentially Iranian officials say they are not yet getting clear proposals from America either directly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been charged of passivity in the aftermath of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran asserts dialogue is not part of a show.

Negotiating Stance

In his remarks to the forum, designed to depict the US as a hegemonic power that misuses the notion of worldwide standards, the foreign minister declared the two-week conflict showed the clash could not be resolved by armed force. He stated the strikes began with a US demand for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is assured the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were executed with total Washington understanding and collaboration, making trust difficult to rebuild.

Diplomacy Stays the Final Answer

The foreign minister stated: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted dialogue; it was America and the Western nations that had always sought to enforce their will during the talks. Diplomacy can still be alive and remains the primary solution to settle conflicts, but its requirements, guidelines and tenets must be followed."

"Provided that they speak to the Iranian people with the tone of dignity and honor, they will obtain a answer in the identical tone."

Recovery and Recovery

In what is described by Iranian officials as the battle of recovery and recovery, Araghchi claimed he was confident Iran's security strengths "are much stronger than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been reestablished. We learned multiple understandings from this conflict; we have come to know our internal vulnerabilities and the shortcomings of the enemy."

He continued: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our enrichment knowledge, which they intended to destroy, stays intact. The facilities and equipment, if eliminated, will be reconstructed; what is essential is the resolve of the nation of Iran and then the national cohesion that they sought to undermine, but failed to shatter. The citizens of Tehran have grown more powerful, more integrated, and more supportive of the leadership and the nation in the wake of this invasion."